|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Mar 18, 2006 23:16:46 GMT -5
This is a video clip from Boston Legal (GREAT teevee show!) of a speech made by Alan Shore (actor James Spader). "... one of those great monologues that we all wished would be said by somebody other than a great actor." - NonE Highly recommended. About 14 meg. in size. .WMV file type. WOW: great clip, moving words (paytriotic though they are at times) and introduced me to the scary legal word 'rendition' -- defined, with examples: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendition_%28law%29PS: That episode is very recent, it aired 14Mar2006: www.imdb.com/title/tt0771018/ (the "Melissa Hughes" character apparently was present in 4 or 5 previous episodes; anyone know what kind of "Stick It*" stance she took in those?  nonE? ) - - - *"Stick It" was the episode name, and apparently fans of the show were split re. how overtly political the show is getting  www.tv.com/boston-legal/stick-it/episode/633248/reviews.html |
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Mar 19, 2006 4:37:12 GMT -5
Well Darren,
If you make an either or out of that one and hang it in a cubicle You might just become part agitator then.
I think I have a little of all 3, cause I like doing things not just sitting around bloviating; however, I wouldn't consider this a forum for that. I have gotten some good ideas here. This is more like sublime inspiration.
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Mar 19, 2006 4:37:37 GMT -5
Or a bad addiction . . .  |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Mar 20, 2006 12:18:05 GMT -5
Well Darren, If you make an either or out of that one and hang it in a cubicle You might just become part agitator then. I think I have a little of all 3, cause I like doing things not just sitting around bloviating; however, I wouldn't consider this a forum for that. I have gotten some good ideas here. This is more like sublime inspiration. Or a bad addiction . . . Addiction, YES, ABSOLUTELY ;D "bad" -- nope, remember "there is no good or bad", according to our deep discussions about -- of all things -- private property PS: 2:37am? Get some sleep, friend, you do not want to imitate me |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Mar 31, 2006 10:50:59 GMT -5
regarding THISHmm. Someone left the light turned off. Bummer. ... Say, Darren, is that you? I can't see in here. Could you help lead me through? You want both of these women to die for supporting someone having the nerve to speak his or her mind in public? That doesn't seem to make sense. I don't get what you are trying to communicate. Lost in LaLaLand. - NonE |
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Mar 31, 2006 12:00:16 GMT -5
NonE,
My impression of what Darren was communicating was that it was a good thing that these women are supporting someone having the nerve to speak his or her mind in public; but that is a dangerous position in the current climate. Ya Know you're either with us or against us. I think Darren was remarking that it would not be a shock if these 2 met an untimely demise; but that it could not simply be and outright termination due to them being rather well known. It must look like an accident.
Darren can speak for himself and clarify but that was what I thought he was communicating, not that he would want it to happen. I.e. the hopefully is that he hopes it is merely a fictional account of a future event that will not take place, but given our current circumstances it is a high possibility that something like that could happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Mar 31, 2006 12:21:44 GMT -5
Aha. Thanks, Sagas. That makes perfect sense, now that you explain it to me. :-)
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 1, 2006 13:07:21 GMT -5
NonE, My impression of what Darren was communicating was that it was a good thing that these women are supporting someone having the nerve to speak his or her mind in public; but that is a dangerous position in the current climate. Ya Know you're either with us or against us. I think Darren was remarking that it would not be a shock if these 2 met an untimely demise; but that it could not simply be and outright termination due to them being rather well known. It must look like an accident. Darren can speak for himself and clarify but that was what I thought he was communicating, not that he would want it to happen. I.e. the hopefully is that he hopes it is merely a fictional account of a future event that will not take place, but given our current circumstances it is a high possibility that something like that could happen. To avoid the possibility of being misunderstood if I respoind sarcastically along the lines of "no, nonE was right ha ha j/k", I will be clear and serious: Sagas4 is correct -- I am concerned that they may have a 'John P. O'Neill' or 'Senator Wellstone' * pulled on them, i.e. their outspoken stance may result in them being a victim of 'wetwork'... well you know what I am saying -- but I hope that does not happen.  There, sorry for not being clear enough originally  I made a further comment in the Sheen thread re. "Third Wave" i.e. Hollywood heavy-hitters going public: thereisnostate.proboards39.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1143220899&page=1#1143914491 ( ...or am I being naive?... ) - - - * re. these outspoken individuals' tragic unexpected deaths, read the non-mainstream sources, or the Wikipedia "Discussion" pages, for the results that come from these searches: google.com/search?q=John+P.+O'Neillgoogle.com/search?q=Senator+WellstoneFor example, www.alternet.org/story/14399/^ reminds me of a (pretty horrible but okay in the beginning) movie I saw on TV last week (" Pursued") where at the movie's start the villain can't convince some exec to join his client's company, so he kills the exec's wife as a warning and of course the newspapers report it as a "burglarly turned homicide" :rolleyes: I fear that sort of thing happens quite a bit |
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Apr 3, 2006 14:46:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 3, 2006 15:40:04 GMT -5
Sad thing is, I actually *get* what you're referring too I think... Censorship is good anyway, remember? "For Your Protection", just like curfews and profiling and checkstops and drugwarpropertyseizures and vaccinatinghelplesschildren and ... |
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Apr 3, 2006 17:16:02 GMT -5
I'm sure you did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 3, 2006 19:02:38 GMT -5
Censorship is good anyway, remember? "For Your Protection", just like curfews and profiling and checkstops and drugwarpropertyseizures and vaccinatinghelplesschildren and ... ...chemtrails and AlertLevels and PatriotActs and 'medicalinterrogations' and indefinitedetentions and 'relocationcamps' and graduatedincometax and coercive_fillintheblank_ and... |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Apr 3, 2006 19:26:07 GMT -5
I have to say that I am a bit embarrased to be seen with all of you. This whole "chemtrails" thing is so "conspiracy-theorist" just plain whack0 that I want to lose the address to this board and never come back. It's embarasing!
Okay, now that I've got THAT out of the way, let me say that I have not investigated ANY of this stuff. It's just too damned weird.
But then when I first heard Marc talking about the 911/WTC stuff I thought he was eating way to many mushrooms, but now that I've looked into it a bit more I'm spending a lot more time going, Hmmm...
So, at some point maybe I'll delve into this "chemtrails" stuff, but until then let me just go on record as saying that you folks are REALLY SCARY!
(But then, that's what most people think of me, I'm sure. So go figure.)
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Apr 3, 2006 19:43:21 GMT -5
Manage the opinion . . . .
Get the majority of folks believing that who ever is claiming [insert government cover-up conspiracy here] is an aluminum foil hat wearing, UFO chasing, nut-job, and then you don't have to worry about anyone listening to these folks cause they're not normal. . . . Also it makes it easier to not have to deal with some obvious evidence nor answer their questions cause they have been marginalized.
P.S. Anyone seen my copper mesh helmet and the key to my Faraday Cage?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 3, 2006 22:21:31 GMT -5
I have to say that I am a bit embarrased to be seen with all of you. This whole "chemtrails" thing is so "conspiracy-theorist" just plain whack0 that I want to lose the address to this board and never come back. It's embarasing! ...umm... thanks? Okay, now that I've got THAT out of the way, let me say that I have not investigated ANY of this stuff. It's just too damned weird. But then when I first heard Marc talking about the 911/WTC stuff I thought he was eating way to many mushrooms, but now that I've looked into it a bit more I'm spending a lot more time going, Hmmm... So, at some point maybe I'll delve into this "chemtrails" stuff, but until then let me just go on record as saying that you folks are REALLY SCARY! (But then, that's what most people think of me, I'm sure. So go figure.) - NonE Seriously, though, reading that Q&A re. chemtrails got me really thinking, hey maybe there are some decent noble individuals with a heart who actually *believe* that the secret use of secret chemicals in our breathing space is For Our Protection -- it actually starts to make a bit of sense, why all those involved aren't coming forward and blowing them whistles, etc... Even if it's a cover story, I truly think that once it gets released to the public, it will actually *help* the cause of liberty because voluntary solutions to solve these problems-caused-by-government-regulation etc. will be actually heard by the terrified masses... Of course some will say "Oh Big Brother, restrain and coerce me even MORE!" but some will finally wake up. I really do believe this. PS: 911 is easy to realize the truth compared to Chemtrails, since the PHYSICS of the dust-that-once-was-1100feet-of-concrete is physically impossible without floor-by-floor focused explosives, i.e. gravity just wouldn't cut it, would immediately contradict the free-fall speed of collapse... With chemtrails the physics are harder to analyze, but I have seen closeup photos of the spiderweb-like strands that allegedly come from the chemtrails, and have seen microscope slides of the biological agents, similar to red blood cells, that apparently help reduce mold growth. Over time there will always be iconoclasts, mavericks who say "Why?" and "Really? Or maybe the truth is actually ..." -- Given time, much will be known for those who actually want to know. PPS: The folks who want to "protect us" without our KNOWLEDGE, let alone our consent, now THOSE folks are scary! Manage the opinion . . . . Get the majority of folks believing that who ever is claiming [insert government cover-up conspiracy here] is an aluminum foil hat wearing, UFO chasing, nut-job, and then you don't have to worry about anyone listening to these folks cause they're not normal. . . . Also it makes it easier to not have to deal with some obvious evidence nor answer their questions cause they have been marginalized. P.S. Anyone seen my copper mesh helmet and the key to my Faraday Cage? Disinfo, the "National Enquirer" route, discredit the whistleblowers, etc. that's the way things have always been done (see the " 25 methods of Disinfo thread). But with the Information Age in full swing, the masses are exposed more and more to the "alternative" views. And the PTB, they're either getting scared or exhausted; either way they'll probably soon take one final step towards complete tyranny. Claire Wolfe will be retitling her book (finally removing off the word "yet" in "don't shoot the... you know".) Eventually I see the possibility things will get so bad we've got 1 of 2 options: Live in a cage of your choice (Faraday, like the Gene Hackman character in "Enemy of the State"!) or live in a cage of their choice (political prisoner) -- not much to choose from, eh? Then again, our seed-planting alien ancestors might come back and rescue us from ourselves just in time, like some Outer Limits episode haha j/k... |
|
nonE? )
www.tv.com/boston-legal/stick-it/episode/633248/reviews.html
