|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on Feb 23, 2007 13:15:37 GMT -5
Many folks seem to suspect that these cloaked craft (often disguised as "cloud" like objects in the middle of a clear blue sky) were how the directed energy weaponry (that is the most likely cause of the complete pulverization of all the non-steel contents of WTC) were produced/targeted/amplified. :-\
No doubt, for my quarter, this has been both the most plausible and yet inherently further aggravating position thus far. Most plausible, because it connects more dots/makes the most sense; further aggravating as its yet another "conspiracy" theory (ie does the technology exist anymore than The State does? yet how else do steel beams vaporize right before your eyes-- well IF they did you see; maybe the video is the conspiracy latest greatest...?! where's my blue pill/State-filled fluff pillow...? :  'Preciate the update tho, both ways! v-e-r-y interesting  (and amazing how much has gone into this/her site; way over this ole boys head!... where then the "who stands to gain" plows over into "who has the gains, "re-venued", to fund such a site... circles to yet another state of days and daze)  |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Feb 23, 2007 15:53:33 GMT -5
..further aggravating as its yet another "conspiracy" theory (ie does the technology exist anymore than The State does? yet how else do steel beams vaporize right before your eyes-- well IF they did you see; maybe the video is the conspiracy latest greatest...?! where's my blue pill/State-filled fluff pillow...? : Funny you should half-pose that question. "Does such technology exist?" |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Feb 23, 2007 17:09:34 GMT -5
This google video of a film on "directed energy weapons" is frightening and is another brick in the wall of belief of mine that a total colapse of the U.S. Dollar is the only thing that may be able to save us from a tyranny that will make Hitler, Mao, Stalin, etc. very proud. I wonder if it is possible to have a society built solely on private ownership, with no government or corporate "entities" such that the encentives would never lead to the kinds of power and weaponry that we seem to get with these fictional entities. I wonder if mankind will live long enough to see if such a thing is possible. Hmm. - NonE (maybe we need a "Cheery Thought for the Day" thread for posts like this)
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Feb 23, 2007 17:26:20 GMT -5
This google video of a film on "directed energy weapons" is frightening and is another brick in the wall of belief of mine that a total colapse of the U.S. Dollar is the only thing that may be able to save us from a tyranny that will make Hitler, Mao, Stalin, etc. very proud. I wonder if it is possible to have a society built solely on private ownership, with no government or corporate "entities" such that the encentives would never lead to the kinds of power and weaponry that we seem to get with these fictional entities. I wonder if mankind will live long enough to see if such a thing is possible. Hmm. - NonE (maybe we need a "Cheery Thought for the Day" thread for posts like this) Uhhh . . . . . he said the O word . . . . or was that O face ? |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Feb 23, 2007 17:43:58 GMT -5
Re: O word... I'm still looking for a better one. You must have me confused with Tharrin. I can see how that would be easy to do. (??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!!)
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Feb 23, 2007 18:01:05 GMT -5
Confuse you . . . Yea right. The o face is what we're on the receiving end og after watching that video on beam weapons. Kind of like a reply I read on Stephen Hawkings Blog, where he outlined and asked a question about if we (all human beings) continue our present course, what is in store for the future of humanity. On response was, "If the smartest guy alive on the planet today is asking that question . . . we're all F%&#ed". |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Feb 23, 2007 18:20:17 GMT -5
F%&%#ed? ALL of us? Even the UGLY ones? Hmm. Maybe that would be GOOD for the ugly ones? See, ya always gotta look on the bright side. (But occasionally welding goggles are advised.)
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on Feb 23, 2007 18:54:50 GMT -5
Half-pose?!? Shoot mahn, when it comes to the likes of doubting for me it's more like my streaking-- I do it all the way or I don't does it at all! If your gonna strike a "pose" might well give it your all!  butt... seriously, not having looked at the link yet, so that caveat, how do I know this "janedoe" isn't some govt op? Like I said, when it comes to Them wacky power guys-- the one's that have been collecting all the "gain" in the "who stands to gain?" query (for how many centuries now?)-- I don't trust much of nuttin' I see, read, watch. Even (and in some cases particularly) if its got "official"-- where I got "lucky" or "privileged" or "inside" enough to see it... Sorry, but this ole boy's belief trust is about down to only what he can put all 5 of his senses on. There's enough right there to keep me busy! [think about it... where for one, am I paying for anybody's rape cage? there's something I can put my hand on; solve it? There's at least the priority it seems to me.] Not to say I don't contemplate/consider the likes of this ["duh!" I'm "hear" aren't eye?]. No doubt there's some reason behind/over/underneath the official one. 'Course one nagging aspect for me all along has been whether the "officials" are that naive, or that delusional, or that gullible to believe the official story-- or if we get to most levels its mostly fear-- other than that highest archy-- that sees this all as their version of Reality Programming entertainment?! [ see The Truman Show?] Does seem a pertinent question, as that "nature" surely is empirically arguable to be human nature in general-- to watch such; ney, to almost thrive on it. We the Peeps got Brittney & Cruise & Springer & Survivor; The Aristocracy's got U.S.? [its like the tv is one of those bug zappers, where the light just draws you to it, closer and closer, then ZAP! no more "light" (enlightenment)] I mean after all, for them what's really left? They've got money... they've got power...?? [ see the movie Trading Places, noting the wager amount] The movie Trading Places is always a good parallel reminder for me. That and The Truman Show. Only if this were funny-- at all. It is no doubt reality. Nothing personal, Double D; actually I thank you for the vent op~ |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Feb 24, 2007 11:14:11 GMT -5
In that " directed energy weapons" video, @ around the 10minute mark, I love* Rummy's evasive response: "...blah blah dodge dodge so in effect, your question is not answerable..." (That's a new one, I'm sure BRLs will start adding that to their bag of tricks ) - - - *by "love", I mean in a sarcastic, non-appreciative way.  |
|
|
|
Post by kevin11 on Feb 26, 2007 14:37:19 GMT -5
Anyone listening to the Alex Jones show....NOW: 1:30 Central time. A caller just called in stating a website had posted a news responder talking about WTC7 going down.
The interesting point the caller made is that the news responder (ergo - to RESPOND) to the WTC7 going down was actually reporting about the WTC7 going down a whole 30 minutes before the building ACTUALLY WENT DOWN.
Alex immediately asked for his tech support to go straight to the site to download. As Alex's tech group was trying to download - the hidden hand attempted to remove the site from public access.
Somehow - the Alex Jones tech group lost it - but were able to then obtain/download it. Alex was estatic that they actually got the clip.
One of Jone's tech supporters said they will be talking about it on the following show w/Jack Blood's show.
Kevin,
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Feb 26, 2007 16:33:59 GMT -5
Interesting, especially if Alex is indeed being used* as a NWO pawn due to his huge popularity. ...then somehow they got it. Yeah, "somehow"...  I really hope that there is some truth to it, however considering how easy it is for The Average Slacker With a Mac to modify audio (and even video) to tell a false story -- especially 5+ years after the event! -- I wouldn't put all my Truth Movement Eggs in that basket. :-\ The freefall+pulverizedintodust physical impossibility is a pretty good issue to keep in focus... - - - * as an example, just try talking to him about the Jews who are against "Zionism", and like others before you you will get hung up if not attacked -- and remember how he treated Marc, which was actually very gentle (i.e. less interruptions, little-to-no actual bullying) compared to some other holders of contrary views he has talked to in the past... |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Feb 26, 2007 17:40:19 GMT -5
There is a really interesting article on the 9/11 Pentagon "event" written by Barbara Honegger. This is a 12 page PDF file. An excellent interview with her on Kevin Barrett's Jan. 13, 2007 "Truth Jihad Radio" show on RBN, which is back up in the restored archives at Hour One and [/url=http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Barrett/0701/20070113_Sat_Barrett2.mp3]Hour 2[/url] This information is about information that she personally obtained by interviews with government employees who were present at the time of the event. Very interesting information. Highly recommended. - NonE Barbara Honegger, MS – Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, the U.S. Navy’s advanced science, technology and national security affairs university (1995 - present). White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to President Ronald Reagan (1981 - 1983). |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Feb 26, 2007 18:54:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Feb 26, 2007 19:24:52 GMT -5
March 2007? Is Robert Heinlein back in business again?? Future History makes so much more sense than that old past tense stuff.
- NonE
(Take note: Darren is probably going to come along and post some silly response indicating that this is the way that the publishing industry works and I should have known this if I weren't a complete fool, bozo and nutjob. But, see here, I'm preempting his vicious attack on my intregity and honar before he has a chance to see these edits to my post that I'm making after I saw whut he rote. So there. NOW try and impugne my versimilitude, dude!)
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Feb 26, 2007 19:46:26 GMT -5
Magazines typically date their monthly issues 1-3 months in advance. Weird, I know, but hey that's the time-sensitive "periodical" industry for ya.
|
|
