Upfront, I apologize for my suggestion re. "computer simulation". void Me.Duh();
Warning: Post Icon = "Thumb Up" for the quality of contents at the webpage NonE linked to.
But "Thumb Down" for how it will make you feel after reading it, even skimming it. Especially once you get to Page 5.
- - -
Dammit.
Curse you, NonE. I was just visiting the site you linked to, as you were posting your obvious and logical response.
Dammit.
I now feel extremely nauseated.
"Thermite" is tossed out of my brain as a completely and totally impossible explanation, just as irrational as weakenedsteel+gravity.
I thought I had "seen it all" when it came to 9-11 photos and analysis. But this stuff truly IS new.
page 3 is especially useful in its collection of Colombo-esque "one more thing that doesn't quite make sense..." observations
but especially probable in making the sheeple stop-and-think...
page 4:
Figure 11. Banker's Trust, a 40-story building, had pulverized dust and some WTC aluminum cladding on its roof -- plus some damage mostly confined to its lower floors. This same pattern prevails in other damaged buildings adjacent to the WTC complex. (See Figure 9, below.) This is surprisingly little damage following destruction of 110-story buildings directly across the street. Why is there
no serious damage to the adjacent buildings above the 20th floors of those buildings? Such damage is less than 20% of the height of a Twin Tower. What would explain why this? Disintegraion and pulverization into talcum-powder-sized dust above the 20th floors would explain this.
s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image247.jpg...and then scroll down to "Figure 62. A close-up of WTC5 and its mysterious holes, shortly after the event." Look at the image above that text. WOW. Where, indeed, did all those floors go? And so neatly "cut away" from the relatively-untouched rest of the building? How in the name of physics did *that* happen?
and on and on the images and questions continue: "In the background, behind the ladder, you can see a section of intact sidewalk with almost no debris on it. This is at the base of the 110-story South Tower, yet the sidewalk was not crushed by falling debris." ... "There is no steam rising. There clearly is no molten metal visible in this section of the basement." ... "there are "serpent-like" steel beam remnants hanging over the hole. They look as though they stopped short of complete disintegration. The metal in the lower right corner of the picture, with a camouflage appearance, looks deformed and dissolved as if attacked by acid. There is a large amount of material distributed throughout that looks as if it were run through a paper shredder. In the lower levels, concrete rebar is exposed apparently because the concrete attached to it was pulverized." :-\
And most revealing of all:
"
The GZ workers in Figures 311 and 312 are not crawling on their hands and knees through dense debris in ruined subbasements. They are walking upright and not ducking beneath low-hanging ceilings. Does this look like a 1/4-mile tall tower crash-landed or pancake-collapsed into the basement? The lower portion of the steel from the east wall of WTC2, shown in Figure 60, is spread over the ground where the main section of WTC4 once stood. The mall is the first floor below all this steel, yet the mall was not crushed."
- - -
Oops, scratch that. Page 4 was amazing.
But
page FIVE truly has "
stuff you've never seen anywhere else before this".
"Toasted Cars".
"A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. [Reference] These vehicles had peculiar patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7 blocks from the WTC, along the East River). Vehicles had missing door handles for example, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of cars burned while paper nearby did not."
Reminds me of an early scene from "ID4".
"Many vehicles had their outer surface peeled away like a sardine can. In some instances, clearly there is more than peeling paint was involved. It appears that the sheet metal delaminated as though something caused the material to melt or disintegrate at a certain depth." ... "The car with the flat tire appears to have "wilted" from heat, from the top down" ... "Figure 74. Why does this ambulance have melted inside doors? The inside looks to have suffered more heat damage than the outside. What would cause that?"
Sickening stuff:
Figure 66(e). Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?"
Figure 77. The mail truck parked on the left side of the street looks burnt. Why? (Click on photo for enlarged view.) The building on the left is the USPS Federal Building and on the right is WTC7. WTC5 is on fire at the end of the street. Why? If this area is hot enough for spontaneous combustion, why isn't the paper on fire?"
"...some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7 blocks from the WTC, along the East River)." (see
i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/010900_lg-map-aerial1red.jpg )
Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn? cuz there's something obviously "drawn" to steel... or maybe cuz the intense heat occurred before the paper debris landed?"Figure yy, below, shows a silver convertible with its top apparently intact but missing some of its window glass. If the windows were blown out from pressure inside, we would expect the convertible top to have been torn or blown off. This suggests that the windows were not blown out by internal pressure, but may have been shattered by some other mechanism."
** WHY DID THE "BIG" NETWORK NEVER SHOW THESE PHOTOS!? **
Here are the principal data that must be explained:
1. The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain (free fall speed "collapse")
2. The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers
3. The rail lines, rail cars and tunnels had only light damage
4. The WTC mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends
5. The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on our comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition
6. The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up, unlike WTC7
7. The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth
8. File cabinet with folder dividers survive
9. Office paper was densly spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side burning cars.
10. Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, plus a cylindrical arc into Bankers Trust and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust
11. All planes but top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes after WTC 1 had been destroyed
12. Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways during the destruction of the Twin Towers
13. The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub.
14. Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged or destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix, and no others.
15. The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared
16. The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the mass, unlike that of WTC7
17. Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves No supper for me tonight.
