|
|
Post by KaosTheory on May 9, 2006 13:41:18 GMT -5
I'd be interested in hearing more guests who are involved with either making or using "No State" Technology. I mean the show is about how to bring about a voluntary society. I'd like to hear from the people who are involved in making this thing happen.
The show with the guy from "Keep Your Assets.net" was great.
I love that kind of "How-To" type stuff.
I'd like to hear about more people who are figuring out how to either side-step the b'crats or circumvent them altogether. One of the callers was describing his experiences with bio-diesel, like Yeoman of the Alcohol thread. I am actually thinking about buying a diesel vehicle now. Especially, after Yeoman said how much the fuel cost for his trip.
One thing that suprises me about the callers is how many of them still call wanting to talk about different aspects of the "constitution" and who still talk about the state as if it were real or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on May 11, 2006 15:32:33 GMT -5
This Saturday, my guest on The No State Project will be Stephan Molyneux. Stephan is host of Freedomain Radio and a regular contributor to lewrockwell.com. |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 11, 2006 16:08:48 GMT -5
*applause, followed by silent, happy anticipation* ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on May 11, 2006 23:11:06 GMT -5
*applause, followed by silent, happy anticipation* ;D I Second Darren's thoughts. If I'm not being too forward here, please don't talk about the Chomster. . . or maybe do, ask him why he is fond of quoting the Chomster so often. Every time I hear him mention the Chomster and speak fondly of the Chomsters words I have a difficult time absorbing what Stephan Molyneux says after that point. Here's Why: It's not that I have any ill feelings toward the Chomster as a person or his academic contributions, but him and his political followers who hail him as an anarcho-capitalist, simply doesn't match with his stated political philosophy when you listen long. I recall him talking about the Steel industry for example: (Paraphrased) His philosophy, well government could do it where private manufacturers would fail because of environmental regulations. Government could produce "environmentally friendly" steel and costs wouldn't cause things like automobiles to rise in price because government can afford to operate a business at a loss because it is not dependent upon the sale of the steel for it's existence. And This. Let's think sir, government has nothing but what it can steal from someone else. It can operate at a loss because it can simply hire more stormtroopers to extract more money from productive folks, who spend way too much time posting on internet bulletin boards . . .  |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 12, 2006 1:12:45 GMT -5
" His philosophy, well government could do it where private manufacturers would fail because of environmental regulations. Government could produce "environmentally friendly" steel and costs wouldn't cause things like automobiles to rise in price because government can afford to operate a business at a loss because it is not dependent upon the sale of the steel for it's existence."
COOL! Maybe we can get them more involved in the oil industry, huh? I'm liking this more and more all the time!
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 12, 2006 10:19:28 GMT -5
Anyone else listening to the Internet feed right now, and finding it got "stuck", jumped, or skipped parts of the interview (during the range of 12-18 minutes or so)... ? Good interview so far... I'm using Audacity yet again, in case Marc doesn't have the ability to get it directly from the radio station. ... 90 minutes in, a lot of *great* phone calls and information shared... But the live stream kept getting cutting off, I mean every 5 minutes  So yuck the audio file is gonna be horrible. Anyone else have better luck? But did you miss it? Did you find the "archives" page at "first amendment radio" didn't have a link to the May 4th program available? Despite the annoyances in the streaming quality, etc. I have finally finished making a rather decent 55 minute audio file out of it. See the "GooglePages.com" link below. PS: May 4th was a week ago and I apologize for the tardiness but I had captured the audio on my computer at work and so could only do the editing (and boy was there a lot to clean up/remove!) during lunch or after work. - - - As usual, feel free to grab the file but do not distribute the link since it is very temporary. (When I get home tonight I will be putting the file up on GAFFE in a more permanent location along the same lines as the Alex Jones interview.) darrendirt.googlepages.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on May 12, 2006 14:58:43 GMT -5
" well government could do it... because government can afford to operate a business at a loss because it is not dependent upon the sale of the steel for it's existence." COOL! Maybe we can get them more involved in the oil industry, huh? I'm liking this more and more all the time! - NonE " ...government can afford..." + "...I'm liking this more and more all the time!" sounds like we got to the "back door" policy... aka the "anal" aspect of Government...?!? bend over... incoming~ 2i2 |
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on May 12, 2006 18:47:12 GMT -5
" His philosophy, well government could do it where private manufacturers would fail because of environmental regulations. Government could produce "environmentally friendly" steel and costs wouldn't cause things like automobiles to rise in price because government can afford to operate a business at a loss because it is not dependent upon the sale of the steel for it's existence." COOL! Maybe we can get them more involved in the oil industry, huh? I'm liking this more and more all the time! - NonE Now that I think of it NonE you're right. . . . again. Government could get involved in everything, take any and all the fruits of all combined labor. There would be no need to have currency, and that wouldn't matter because everything would be free. Of course before that could happen some system would need to be devised to make sure someone doesn't get more than their fair share, and those that have more need could get more when they need it. i.e. each according to need, not necessarily ability. Example: Since my partner is married and has has 6 kids and although I put up twice the capital for investment, and he puts up twice the labor of me because he has more available work time, and although we split profits evenly, the government could take it all and make sure he gets more since he has more of a need. In fact government could make sure I only get 1/6 in comparison cause that's all I really need. I Like it. |
|
|
|
Post by KaosTheory on May 17, 2006 22:55:50 GMT -5
Marc,
Would you consider having Pete Hendrickson on as a guest?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 23, 2006 17:44:27 GMT -5
re. May 20th program: no Stefan M. -- what happened? D'oh! Never mind -- it was on the 13th that Stefan was your guest -- I guess the mp3.rbnlive.com page was wrong  |
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on May 24, 2006 9:56:57 GMT -5
This Saturday, May 27, 2006, my guest on The No State Project will be Ray Barnes. Mr. Barnes is a retired private investigator and currently a member of the Arizona house judiciary committee. We will be discussing the doctrine of standing in Arizona courts.
|
|
|
|
Post by dvishnu on May 24, 2006 12:37:26 GMT -5
That's way too funny....A sitting member of the Arizona Legislature talking about standing in the courts.... ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on May 24, 2006 20:22:33 GMT -5
May 20th good show. Marc, do you take calls as soon as you get them, or stack them like some do so you can get through a few points first? Was just wondering as it might be illustrative of whether these folks are listening from the beginning or just tuning in to the end in prep for the next show. It is cool though. All the callers tonight seemed to realize there is too much government/control/violence, but seem a little timid about taking that next mental step. With a little listening and some study perhaps they'll have a Revolution in their thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on May 25, 2006 15:22:45 GMT -5
I take the calls as they come in. Last week there was nothing then 4 calls came in 15 minutes before the show ended.
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 28, 2006 9:36:35 GMT -5
Interesting what "commitment" means to a government agent, isn't it?
- NonE
|
|
So yuck the audio file is gonna be horrible. Anyone else have better luck?
