HELP! Applying AILL in Different Scenarios

[weishaupt1776]

I'd like to discuss ways in which we can apply Logical Questioning In Real Scenarios when dealing with unproductive bureaucracies that are not courts, cops, or the STATE.

Some backgroung regarding my situation first:

So, looking at this factually, according to admin; I have to ask permission to first have a meeting in front of all of the other contractors and to then come to a "consensus" as to a uniform amount for everyone to make due to a data entry problem.

What say ye?

What questions should I ask to box them in order to

• show how they have no right to determine how much I charge
• How ridiculous it is that a computer is keeping me from charging more
• That the real reason admin is making such a fuss is that I didn't come to them like a son asking if he can take the car out on a Saturday Night
• Why we have to have a meeting with other contractors
• Why we have to all make a uniform amount in order to make data entry easier.?

Please help, as I'm thoroughly pissed off right now.

[learnin2]

I would demand them to provide proof of ownership of you and your labor, or jurisdiction to control the value of your labor. Tell them it's now $50.00, (since you may now have to incure the legal costs of taking them to court).
Is there evidence of a contractual obligation?

[weis]

On another forum that question kept coming up. That was the first question I asked as well. The answer from TG was
"well we offered you to make $20 & you agreed, there's the evidence".

Another question could be,

[sagas4]

Weis,

Now I get the rest of the story. Sorry, just now getting to the posts. I did not understand the nature of the problem in the email.

After reading this my original reply still holds. I would do a cost/benefit analysis and investigate doing the admin yourself, or find another provider and deal with some of these issues up front.

I will send another email with some more detail about the examples offered.

[learnin2]

Rate increases would be submited in a new contract, which they are free to not engage in. They are also free to not renew any current contracts, if they can get the services elsewhere for less cost. Why keep giveing raises to someone, when you can hire one or two more people to do more work for the same cost, or less?