|
|
Post by lummox2 on May 9, 2007 11:36:09 GMT -5
I should resubscribe. Top fun. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 9, 2007 12:15:24 GMT -5
Well, apparently not! ;D - NonE I blame Marc for starting the whole 'noid topic  |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 9, 2007 12:22:16 GMT -5
It's OBVIOUSLY Marc's fault. He started the damned board, didn't he? A=A and all that... we're all victims. Someone should sue Marc, or at least call Submitizen Protective Services and report him. It's a crime, I tell you, a crime!
- NonE ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 9, 2007 13:29:03 GMT -5
It's OBVIOUSLY Marc's fault. He started the damned board, didn't he? A=A and all that... we're all victims. Someone should sue Marc, or at least call Submitizen Protective Services and report him. It's a crime, I tell you, a crime! - NonE ;D Well obviously someone beside you will have to file a claim... after all when Marc challenges "Is there evidence of a complaining party" how can a "non-entity" be proven? |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 9, 2007 13:35:45 GMT -5
How about whining? Is it okay for me to whine?
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on May 9, 2007 13:41:50 GMT -5
How about whining? Is it okay for me to whine?
- NonE As long as you vote; whiners vote (or they can't whine)  (and you've got the number, right? dial: whine-1-1) |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 13, 2007 16:12:59 GMT -5
We can not make men free by getting rid of The State; we can get rid of The State by making men free.--Stefan Molynuex, podcast Man, Family, And State *speechless awe* |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 13, 2007 16:31:07 GMT -5
"making men free..." Hmm. Lemme think on that one, Stef. Is that similar to the freedom we're installing in Iraq? Inquiring minds want the guru to inform.
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on May 13, 2007 19:24:27 GMT -5
blah, blah, blah...
(nit-pick a word, ok? for me, used in the context- here and on the site -it implies no force)
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 13, 2007 19:33:10 GMT -5
blah, blah, blah... (nit-pick a word, ok? for me, used in the context- here and on the site -it implies no force) I would guess that for you that is correct. But for all the hired killers "we" have stationed around the world it may mean just what it says... Just as they believe they can torture "the truth" out of people. - NonE |
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on May 13, 2007 19:38:05 GMT -5
Oh.
My bad. You meant "those" gurus.
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on May 13, 2007 19:41:05 GMT -5
gurai?
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on May 13, 2007 19:55:34 GMT -5
guranomoes... (and larrys and curlys)  |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 14, 2007 9:37:25 GMT -5
We can not make men free by getting rid of The State; we can get rid of The State by making men free.--Stefan Molynuex, podcast Man, Family, And State *speechless awe* "making men free..." Hmm. Lemme think on that one, Stef. Is that similar to the freedom we're installing in Iraq? Inquiring minds want the guru to inform. - NonE FINE. Here it is, all "PC"ed up for NonE: "Mankind will not be free as a result of the removal of the legitimacy of 'the State', but the legitimacy of 'the State' will disappear as a result of Mankind being free." Or something like that. Yeesh! ^More accurate but far less "clean" |
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on May 14, 2007 10:00:46 GMT -5
anecdote: its funny to me, that I almost "PC'd" it myself-- again, from having heard it in context (of both the author specific and the author on record) but thought it might be interesting to see if the bait would hook; my PC on it:
No one can be made free by getting rid of The State; every one can get rid of The State by becoming free.
Granting as well, Stefan could perhaps work on the focus of individualization rather than generalization. (and perhaps some of the "general" I zeal)
Maybe after I get my 700th+ podcast done I'll approach him about such blatant error...
And kudos to NonE for having in my past helped me to see (and 'speak') the individual importance/emphasis.
|
|
