Post by Darren Dirt on Jun 9, 2006 10:36:46 GMT -5
Just thought I would put into one place a lot of the "AIDS Hoax" info from various places on this forum:
He should have never been taking drugs for HIV and I don't have the time to debate you, even if I wanted to, which I don't. My response was for the world to see so they can study both sides intensely then form a conclusion rather than just reading the opinion of some dead 'healer' with HIV in their system. Everyone, Google "AIDS HIV hoax". Also see Gary Null's book, "AIDS: A Second Opinion." And:
www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl09a1.shtml
www.buildfreedom.com/aidsdir.htm
...I also thought it was kinda neat, about a year ago I was reading about alternative views on the nature of cancer and AIDS, and I stumbled upon an iconoclast named Dr. Leonard Horowitz, who at the time was writing a book about...
you guessed it...
the nature of DNA.
- - -
Horowitz: www.tetrahedron.org/articles/health_lifestyle/DNA.htm ( and a "review": www.tetrahedron.org/DNA_Review.htm )
The Duesberg link says it all really.
KT
WOW...
www.duesberg.com/papers/pddrgenetica.html
In view of this, we propose that the long-term consumption of recreational drugs (such as cocaine, heroin, nitrite inhalants, and amphetamines) and prescriptions of DNA chain-terminating and other anti-HIV drugs, cause all AIDS diseases in America and Europe that exceed their long-established, national backgrounds, i.e. >95%. Chemically distinct drugs cause distinct AIDS-defining diseases; for example, nitrite inhalants cause Kaposi's sarcoma, cocaine causes weight loss, and AZT causes immunodeficiency, lymphoma, muscle atrophy, and dementia.
The drug hypothesis predicts that AIDS:
(1) is non-contagious;
(2) is non-random, because 85% of AIDS causing drugs are used by males, particularly sexually active homosexuals between 25 and 49 years of age, and
(3) would follow the drug epidemics chronologically.
I recall hearing or reading somewhere that those who went on the "AIDS cocktail"* or even took certain "AIDS tests" seemed to have the serious symptoms kick in, i.e. it's not as simple as the existence of a so-called virus. IMHO, the "drug hypothesis" linked above makes a lot more sense than some theoretical virus trigger which goes against the criteria of a true viral infection.
(...Sez a man not trained in any way in medicine in biology )
*quite a claim, the above, "AZT causes immunodeficiency"...
*Numerous names and theories summarized here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_conspiracy_theories
neo said:
He should have never been taking drugs for HIV and I don't have the time to debate you, even if I wanted to, which I don't. My response was for the world to see so they can study both sides intensely then form a conclusion rather than just reading the opinion of some dead 'healer' with HIV in their system. Everyone, Google "AIDS HIV hoax". Also see Gary Null's book, "AIDS: A Second Opinion." And:
www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl09a1.shtml
www.buildfreedom.com/aidsdir.htm
darrendirt said:
...I also thought it was kinda neat, about a year ago I was reading about alternative views on the nature of cancer and AIDS, and I stumbled upon an iconoclast named Dr. Leonard Horowitz, who at the time was writing a book about...
you guessed it...
the nature of DNA.
- - -
Horowitz: www.tetrahedron.org/articles/health_lifestyle/DNA.htm ( and a "review": www.tetrahedron.org/DNA_Review.htm )
darrendirt said:
KaosTheory said:
The Duesberg link says it all really.
KT
WOW...
www.duesberg.com/papers/pddrgenetica.html
In view of this, we propose that the long-term consumption of recreational drugs (such as cocaine, heroin, nitrite inhalants, and amphetamines) and prescriptions of DNA chain-terminating and other anti-HIV drugs, cause all AIDS diseases in America and Europe that exceed their long-established, national backgrounds, i.e. >95%. Chemically distinct drugs cause distinct AIDS-defining diseases; for example, nitrite inhalants cause Kaposi's sarcoma, cocaine causes weight loss, and AZT causes immunodeficiency, lymphoma, muscle atrophy, and dementia.
The drug hypothesis predicts that AIDS:
(1) is non-contagious;
(2) is non-random, because 85% of AIDS causing drugs are used by males, particularly sexually active homosexuals between 25 and 49 years of age, and
(3) would follow the drug epidemics chronologically.
I recall hearing or reading somewhere that those who went on the "AIDS cocktail"* or even took certain "AIDS tests" seemed to have the serious symptoms kick in, i.e. it's not as simple as the existence of a so-called virus. IMHO, the "drug hypothesis" linked above makes a lot more sense than some theoretical virus trigger which goes against the criteria of a true viral infection.
(...Sez a man not trained in any way in medicine in biology )
*quite a claim, the above, "AZT causes immunodeficiency"...
*Numerous names and theories summarized here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_conspiracy_theories