|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on May 29, 2006 3:16:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Jun 5, 2006 18:49:20 GMT -5
It's been quiet in this and related threads. Surprising, actually, considering the current "Chicago" gathering going on this week (I just listened to Webster Tarpley's June 3rd radio program -- wow what an amazing collection of speakers!) So while it's quiet (i.e. before the possible false flag psy-op of 6-6-6 happens, God forbid) perhaps it's time to get "up to speed" on what the assure-yourselves-folks-nothing-to-worry-about official theory sez about the collapse of the WTC towers -- and why that theory is pretty much impossible. Offical Story a.k.a. the Anti-Physics Fairy Tale and heavily-mocked "Conspiracy Theories" |
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Jun 5, 2006 19:01:57 GMT -5
Uhhh,
could someone splain this 2 me . . .
That don't make sense. That 3 floors on fire with fireproofing would cause a collapse, and fireproofing wasn't added until 1975 after 6 (SIX) floors caught on fire . . . and I don't recall the building collapsing in 1975 and being "rebuilt" . . . . hmmmm . . .
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Jun 5, 2006 19:41:13 GMT -5
Sagas... we don't LIKE your kind!
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Jun 6, 2006 0:01:11 GMT -5
;D I'm sorry . . . I don't understand . . . I'm just askin a question.  |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Jun 7, 2006 14:53:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Jun 16, 2006 12:18:39 GMT -5
*** Highly recommended hour of your time -- 7 minutes in I'm typing this, again the audio is a HIGHLY RECOMMENDED way to spend an hour of your time. (!)  *** |
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Jun 17, 2006 8:43:13 GMT -5
Darren sez:
"*** Highly recommended hour of your time -- 7 minutes in I'm typing this, again the audio is a HIGHLY RECOMMENDED way to spend an hour of your time. (!) ***"
I will second that, Darren, HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on Jun 17, 2006 9:56:29 GMT -5
so has anyone heard or reasoned as to WTC7's mysterious collapse being that something went amuck as to the flight that went down in the field as it was to have struck WTC7 according to "THE PLAN" (aka THE STATE) and so they simply "pulled it" (as of course was also in THE PLAN) ie set off the demolition charges anyway? [noting, that according to what I've heard, it was WTC7's content destruction that was perhaps most crucial for The Plan...?] Interesting to contemplate whether things simply are subject to human error and thus alternate "plans" unfold "on the fly" (ugh; bad pun); equally interesting as to considering the state of mind of individuals entertwined in this sort of plot as to wonder if some might get further jollies as to "tweaking" the plan to see others in it squirm... or show their "abilities" (create cover propaganda in real time)-- as its all a matter of perspective?!
one quick comment, as to reading (rather than listening) to D R Griffin's speech, as to wonder at how derranged the minds behind such as this must be; as I then ponder if it is the power of delusion... or of unmitigated gall... or even the intoxication of power that is similar with gambling... as to the "official" stories being obviously disprovable by experts (ie many as in this speech), yet The Plan is formulated and carried out regardless. Mind boggling to even conceive such "people" being among "us"... with such a STATE of mind.
I suppose we can only envision The Big Boys laughing all the way to the proverbial Power Bar (named The Gold Bar, happy hour special being The Power Aid... served to Members Only~)
2i2
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on Jun 17, 2006 10:21:07 GMT -5
and while we're letting the paranoia rabbit run...
Mr Griffin says:
so why is Mr Griffin "saying"... or more to the point: being "allowed" to say (ie not "induced"...? Mr Paranoia whispers in my ear "Hey, maybe these intoxicated goons get their jollies with such 'leaks' as a good laff at the gullibility of We The Sheople... ala mental masterbation.." or perhaps its just too big a stage... too large a Pax Romana Arena...
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Jul 17, 2006 14:26:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on Jul 17, 2006 20:45:20 GMT -5
September 11*Revisited. Yet another awesome no-hype vid! thanx DD~
Ask all your friends (again):
1. How many buildings were struck by planes on 09-11-01?
2. How many buildings collapsed at free-fall speed on 09-11-01?*
And ask them to watch this (free) video!
eye2i additional "?":
* is it perhaps significant that as 3 World Trade Center buildings collapsed-- only 2 being hit by planes --there was a 3rd plane involved in 9-11... (it just didn't reach its destination) when it crashed in the field in Pennsylvania?!?
|
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on Jul 19, 2006 15:32:56 GMT -5
Good questions. The MSM has done their job, too many people believe fire brought down the buildings.
It's great these videos are being posted, more people are waking up. I think 911 will be very instrumental in the government's undoing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Jul 19, 2006 17:33:21 GMT -5
"It's inevitable!" ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Jul 28, 2006 1:08:22 GMT -5
New: an overview, combining the really simple, core impossible-to-ignore problems with the "official story". 19 minutes 45 seconds of antiestablishmentarianism... Secret Evil of 9/11video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6714356054823827684&q=secret+evil+of+9%2F11" Don't shut up (what BillO told people to do in the handful of video clips included here) ... Think for yourself. Ask questions -- demand answers! There's more at stake than you think." ;D As Marc has pointed out repeatedly, more and more of this stuff is getting there and eventually will help prove the 9/11 scam as key in bringing about folks' complete distrust of "their" government, and thus open minds to voluntaryism... - - - No surprise: these countless indie documents are having the desired effect: Hit Movie Director Slams Bush Administration - Linklater says Hollywood stars, including Bruce Willis, having political paradigms changed by 9/11 conspiracy documentaries |
|
***