|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Oct 26, 2006 11:51:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Nov 17, 2006 14:57:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by eye2i2hear on Nov 17, 2006 18:50:42 GMT -5
I just think they're kinda neat to watch, and heck imagine if the average "law enforcement officer" watched a few of these, maybe it would get him wondering just how many others are like these competitors, re. skill with a firearm... for recreation and self defense, of course.where of course some might equally find such "skill with a firearm" directed at said policy "enforcement" (aka jack-booted thugs) to be the best use for the legal phrase "for entertainment purposes"?!?  JUST KIDDIN', officer(s)! eye swear!
actually, aiming words of enlightment at the ears and directing AiLL copies at the eyes rather than lead at the arses is the ideal self-defense imo |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Nov 20, 2006 5:57:34 GMT -5
Taking Heinlein one step further, imagine how "POLITE" a society that is not only well-armed as in trained-with-pistols-etc. but also well-armed as in understanding-of-individual-rights-etc. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Nov 20, 2006 11:18:55 GMT -5
Taking Heinlein one step further, imagine how "POLITE" a society that is not only well-armed as in trained-with-pistols-etc. but also well-armed as in understanding-of-individual-rights-etc. ;D I recommend this article by Butler Shaffer with particular attention to his reference to Law for the Elephant. - NonE |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Dec 19, 2006 12:56:49 GMT -5
Yay, logic and reason! Chew on this, Michael Moore... "In the wake of school shootings in Wisconsin, Colorado and Pennsylvania during the last two weeks, a state legislator says he plans to introduce legislation that would allow teachers, principals, administrators and other school personnel to carry concealed weapons..." - Packing.org news ( 11Oct2006)  |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Mar 16, 2007 14:20:37 GMT -5
good news?- - - Last Friday a federal appeals court in Washington DC issued a ruling that hopefully will result in the restoration of 2nd Amendment rights in the nation's capital. It appears the Court rejected the District of Columbia's nonsensical argument that the 2nd Amendment confers only a "collective right," something gun control advocates have asserted for years. Rights, by definition, are individual. "Group rights" is an oxymoron.Can anyone seriously contend that the Founders, who had just expelled their British rulers mostly by use of light arms, did not want the individual farmer, blacksmith, or merchant to be armed? Those individuals would have been killed or imprisoned by the King's soldiers if they had relied on a federal armed force to protect them. When the 2nd Amendment speaks of a "well-regulated militia," it means local groups of individuals operating to protect their own families, homes, and communities. They regulated themselves because it was necessary and in their own interest to do so.Gun control historically serves as a gateway to tyranny. Tyrants from Hitler to Mao to Stalin have sought to disarm their own citizens, for the simple reason that unarmed people are easier to control. Our Founders, having just expelled the British army, knew that the right to bear arms serves as the guardian of every other right. This is the principle so often ignored by both sides in the gun control debate. Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government.- Ron Paul, " The DC Gun Ban" (13Mar2007) - - - ...armed with instruments of self-defense and knowledge, *AND* a willingness to exercise BOTH, no tyranny may stand... ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on Mar 16, 2007 16:53:02 GMT -5
It's amazing people like Shumer in New York think the 2nd amendment (irrelevant to my owning a gun anyway) only applies to the National Guard (US army). Yes, the army was not armed from 1776 thru 1791 because they had to wait until the 2nd amendment became "law". Statists. |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 17, 2007 14:18:13 GMT -5
"Initial reports suggested there were two shooters, but the story quickly changed to just one shooter who later killed himself (as happens in almost all these cases) or was shot by police..." 2 hour delay between shootings. More than 30 dead, 1 shooter, 2 handguns. Yeah right. Virginia School Shooting: Another Government Black-Op?"Eyewitness accounts describe police hiding behind trees and failing to pursue the killer, while ordering the school to be placed on lockdown so nobody could escape the carnage as the killer picked off his targets with seemingly little interruption from the police..." <-- sound familiar?  Even "state" approved concealed-carry was not allowed on campus... Yet again, proof that gun control "works" (for criminals).  |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 19, 2007 17:31:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 19, 2007 17:50:18 GMT -5
omg, I lost count of the # of complete lies and half-lies and quarter-lies and one-sided perspectives included in this brief video of a "Sky News" story... news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0%2c%2c31200-1261610%2c.htmlNotice the only [wo]man-on-the-street interviews they included were those who saw guns as an objectively morally "bad" thing, etc.  - - - a unique perspective on gun control- - - btw, 2 hours of Alex Jones the morning of the shooting (which Jones labeled as occurring in a "victim disarmament zone")... prisonplanet.com/audio/160407shooting.mp3The early reports were *not* just that there were 2 shooters. But ALSO that the first shooter killed himself after the first series of murders (i.e. before the 2 hour "gap"). Hmmm.... "He had a 60% fatality rate. With handguns. That is unheard of."- Charles Mesloh, Professor of Criminology at Florida Gulf Coast University www.infowars.com/articles/us/va_tech_shooter_was_mind_controlled_assassin.htm^ AHA! There it is -- the reason why this was made to occur, and of course so close to Columbine+10Years. To encourage "lawmakers" to start banning the lowly HANDGUN, even those that are not (presently) considered the more "high risk" personal firearms. |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 23, 2007 14:24:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 24, 2007 10:21:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Apr 24, 2007 10:37:18 GMT -5
Darren,
If your allergies are of the hay fever type, there is a great gizmo that I've been using for a few years now that almost eliminates my need for antihistamines. It's called Bionase. Look it up. It's not approved in the United Slaves of America but there is a pharmacy in London which will sell it you US, which is how I got mine. Using this thing I only have to pop pills on the very worst of days. It really works!
- NonE
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 24, 2007 10:52:18 GMT -5
Darren, If your allergies are of the hay fever type... I responded in the Health Info thread. |
|
) was a probable "