|
|
Post by Neo on Feb 6, 2005 12:29:30 GMT -5
Few things will get you labeled a "constitutional patriot" faster than using words like "sui juris" and "freeman" in addition to taking the sort of stance that you just did, by those words. Not my opinion. Experience.
The meaning of your message can often be determined by the response that you get. How the mind works.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neo on Feb 6, 2005 13:45:39 GMT -5
I know. Agents will twist your words and put you together with them. There's the the risk of word choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on Feb 6, 2005 14:48:52 GMT -5
I like res nullius, the property of no one. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Neo on Feb 6, 2005 15:36:23 GMT -5
I like words requiring no translation, e.g., "I'm not your slave," or, "I own my own life." Problem is, agents don't care what you say about yourself, all they care how they intrepret your activities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neo on Feb 7, 2005 22:59:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tharrin on Feb 16, 2005 14:00:58 GMT -5
I guess I understand somewhat why there is acrimony towards this person called SuiJurisFreeman. I discount a great deal of his claims based solely on their roots in the ficticious state and the text created by them. To do otherwise ligitimizes their existence. Yet, I keep an open mind as I do with Marc's stuff. Marc's methods definitely put the illusory state (with it's constituent minions) back on their heals. I applaud that but his methods still employ the rules and text that the illusion created. Once the illusion is dispelled the true nature of those D/B/A the state will become quite painfuly apparent. Once the shackles of pretense are dropped all those binding words they have created won't be worth a plug nickel and they will happily use you for target practice or as an example to keep the rest of the sheep in line.
Perhaps this man is an agent, I am not sure I could identify one if I met him or her but success of Marc's material relies on the illusory state following their semblance of reality. Even if the system corrected itself to one degree or another doesn't ligitimize their existence or any power they may claim over you regardless of how just and fair they pretend or appear to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by sagas4 on Feb 16, 2005 14:04:41 GMT -5
I guess I understand somewhat why there is acrimony towards this person called SuiJurisFreeman. I discount a great deal of his claims based solely on their roots in the ficticious state and the text created by them. To do otherwise ligitimizes their existence. Yet, I keep an open mind as I do with Marc's stuff. Marc's methods definitely put the illusory state (with it's constituent minions) back on their heals. I applaud that but his methods still employ the rules and text that the illusion created. Once the illusion is dispelled the true nature of those D/B/A the state will become quite painfuly apparent. Once the shackles of pretense are dropped all those binding words they have created won't be worth a plug nickel and they will happily use you for target practice or as an example to keep the rest of the sheep in line. Perhaps this man is an agent, I am not sure I could identify one if I met him or her but success of Marc's material relies on the illusory state following their semblance of reality. Even if the system corrected itself to one degree or another doesn't ligitimize their existence or any power they may claim over you regardless of how just and fair they pretend or appear to be. Interesting observation Tharrin., So if we loose our initial battle, and want "justice", do you Appeal?? Whos rules are you following when you appeal? |
|
|
|
Post by marc stevens on Feb 16, 2005 21:30:53 GMT -5
Once the shackles of pretense are dropped all those binding words they have created won't be worth a plug nickel and they will happily use you for target practice or as an example to keep the rest of the sheep in line. Perhaps this man is an agent, I am not sure I could identify one if I met him or her but success of Marc's material relies on the illusory state following their semblance of reality. Keep in mind the material is to expose the scam, not necessarily get a case kicked out. If a case gets kicked because the scam is exposed, great! But, success with the material is when the scam is exposed. Throwing out the pretense of legitimacy and operating by naked aggression/violence exposes the scam; everyone present will see them for what they are: a gang of killers, thieves and liars. |
|
|
|
Post by Neo on Feb 17, 2005 0:54:02 GMT -5
For everyone's information, I didn't start this thread. My name appears on the main menu as if I did because of a glitch in the matrix, so to speak. When the first person's post is deleted, the next person's reply becomes first, and so does their name. Bad software.
|
|
