DL suspension - unconstitutional

[lavender]

TEXT Excellent questions to bring up. I know that eventually he will have to listen to me after I disqualify the court apptd. attorney. I will still have with me a copy of his oath of office in my papers, so if I need to ask "are we going to go 100% by your oath of office here today? I also want the burden of proof on them to prove I was driving a "motor vehicle", commercial capacity, etc. Thanks for the thread K.

[KaosTheory]

Focus on the the plaintiff first.....who is the plaintiff? Does a plaintiff exist or is it a figment of someone's imagination? If you argue about motor vehicles first, then you are agreeing that there is a plaintiff in the first place. Not good...

If they can not even prove that a plaintiff exists then there is no need to get the proof about the motor vehicle. First things first. Focus here.

You are not fighting against flesh and blood, you are fighting someone's imaginary creature.

KT

[marc stevens]

Good post KT.

I keep the focus off the so-called merits.

Am I entitled to a fair hearing?

OK, then who do you represent here Mr. Judge?

Same principal. The underlying issue is irrelevant if I can't get a fair hearing. ;D

[lavender]

TEXT Thanks Marc, I guess I will keep this as simple as possible, thanks everyone, K and all for your responses. I hope they don't come in with something to confuse me since I get flustered easily and I will probably be there all by my self.

[marc stevens]

It's very difficult to get confused if I keep reminding them to be responsive.