|
|
Post by NonEntity on Apr 27, 2007 15:52:46 GMT -5
short note, i'm at work... You and Darren obviously approach that concept from different ends of the spectrum! ;D - NonE |
|
|
|
Post by lesactive on Apr 27, 2007 21:49:20 GMT -5
which, short or work?
|
|
|
|
Post by NonEntity on Apr 28, 2007 10:17:04 GMT -5
Darren spends all day on the board doing regal researches, copious commentations, horrendous humoriffics, and lasivicious libraritiums... then he goes home from work.  - NonEnmity |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 28, 2007 11:58:33 GMT -5
wuht kin eye sei, i multi-tasc!  |
|
|
|
Post by lesactive on Apr 28, 2007 17:00:57 GMT -5
Haha, I don't think my clients would appreciate me interrupting their tattoo to engage in sophistries online. Especially the large, smelly clients. Though I do discuss my ideas with many people while working on them, especially cops and lawyers when I get a chance. They're much easier to confront when I'm the one in control. Never piss off your tattooer!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 28, 2007 21:40:37 GMT -5
sophistries: plausible but misleading or fallacious arguments :-\ wuh?
|
|
|
|
Post by lesactive on Apr 28, 2007 22:38:28 GMT -5
As in picking apart their sophistries. I have too many questions to really know anything so I can hardly be misleading |
|
|
|
Post by Darren Dirt on Apr 30, 2007 16:35:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob Menard on Nov 26, 2007 18:16:22 GMT -5
Hi I'm Rob. HI Les! I agree I may have 'lost it' on the other forum, but some people frustrate me when they willfully choose what I see as blindness. I am learning though, and like all others am here to grow and develop and patience is one lesson I am learning. I do try to be loving and compassionate, and recognize their importance to us all, but still, sometimes, (are you with me?) sometimes, you just want to find a fish and slap sense into some people...
If the stuff I espouse sounds like what others have put forth, I suggest it may be due to it being at least partially true. I have found another so called loop hole, but look at it more like a foundation of law. I am now teaching how to use a Claim of Right to establish lawful excuse to disobey any court, tribunal, statute, Act, bylaw or regulation. I also have a new DVD soon to be released called "With Lawful Excuse" and a full color 170 page graphic novel of the same name.
Additionally, I have extensive evidence from numerous sources that the student loan discharge program I teach works and works well. People who have done it have reports from EQUIFAX about their credit ratings and the student loan is demonstrably and honorably discharged.
Wishing you all well!
Rob
|
|
|
|
Post by David Hinkley on Jun 11, 2008 0:53:06 GMT -5
I attended a seminar put on by Rob about 2 years ago which jump started me into researching these ideas further. As far as I can tell, according to definitions in our Canadian statutes, there is most certainly a duality in the meaning of 'person'. A common meaning, human, and a legal meaning, corporation. The presumption is made that you agree to be a person in society by taking part in 'benefits'. I started a thread in a Canadian political forum based on a couple of Robs' videos that are still on google (links in the thread) and got quite the response. A lawyer or 2 get involved and then Rob shows up by page 7 and completely loses his cool with the forum about 5-6 pages later but not before clearly stating his positions. You may enjoy it... www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=8612Man, I don't think he loses his cool... a lawyer tries to suggest some disgusting notions and pass them off as sweet nursery rhymes and Rob takes back the mile and the inch... EVERYONE will thoroughly enjoy where Rob "loses his cool" at (Post #174) www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=8612&view=findpost&p=209948[/size][/i][/b] ---- really, it's a must! You know the saying "It's funny 'cause it's true" well, that definitely applies here. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmy on Aug 22, 2008 11:53:28 GMT -5
jimmy dont like government
|
|
|
|
Post by Camino on Nov 15, 2008 17:47:30 GMT -5
IMHO
Since all Governments are corporations and these corporations have their agents write their "statutes" then it follows then that these so called "statutes" are nothing more than corporate by-laws. For by-laws to apply one must be a member / employee or agents of that corporation. For statutes to apply, you must be a member of that society. To be a member of anything requires consent. Consent is the whole basis of our belief system. Free Agency was given to us not by any law of man and cannot be taken away by any law of man. This the only true right we have. Criminal behaviour is a violation of consent. All other rights stem from this simple truth. The right to LIFE is the ability to say no to death from another, self defense laws stem from the law of necessity which is the lack of any other choice. The right to Liberty is the ability to say no to enslavement / confinement. Property rights are meaningless without consent, how can you have property if anyone may take it?
So the real question is: Is it lawful to act without consent? Performance or duties are the domain of contract, which is a choice, not of law. Consent can be given or taken away, it's that simple. As Robert states: you are either a member of their society or you are not. Your choice.
|
|
